Brown’s (2012) Chapter on Clients with Special Needs brought
social injustice to the forefront of career counseling. When discussing career counseling for
individuals with disabilities a salient point was that the career options for
these individuals should be as wide and vast as the “universe of jobs” (Brown,
2012). Our society stigmatizes
individuals with disabilities and usually associates a disability as limiting
and negative; therefore, impacting these individuals in the form of developing
the same attitudes toward themselves. The workplace could be a hard world for
someone with disabilities especially if co-workers, employers, and customers
are not accepting; thus, career counselors need to address the transition between
the worker and the work place (Brown, 2012).
Again, advocacy is another essential piece for practitioners to strive
toward in order to provide the most effective career counseling to their
clients.
Another major social injustice related to career development
is when Brown (2012) says, “unemployed, economically deprived people develop
low self-esteem and higher levels of depression” (pp. 126 via Waters &
Moore, 2001). This immediately stood
out as being a huge deal because one can conceive of the viscous cycle this
type of data establishes. Indeed Bluestein
(2005) is right: people do begin the occupational
race in vastly different places (i.e. disabled individuals, women, displaced
workers, economically disadvantaged, delayed entrants) (Brown, 2012). An individual who is at the poverty level
faces a deprivation in resources that affect their struggle at getting a job
because they may not have the appropriate resources (i.e. transportation, child
care, etc.) (Brown, 2012). Furthermore,
how likely is it that these individuals will seek and receive career counseling? Moreover, an individual who is depressed and
exhibits low self-esteem will probably not interview very well and would be unpleasant
at work; therefore, never searching for a job, searching for a job but not
getting the job, or getting the job but unable to maintain the job, which will
cause them to have lowered self-esteem and maintain a higher level of depression. This is just one example of how the data
Brown (2012) discussed can be conveyed as an astronomically negative issue which
needs addressed. Prilleltensky’s (1997)
Empowerment Model focuses on equalizing power and disturbing access to resources
on a more level playing field. Could the
empowerment model be applied in the United States and how would that look in
our society? What’s more Blustein (2005)
proposed that career counselors need to value human diversity, ratify social
justice, engage in political actions, and orient themselves to non-clients that
are marginalized by the economic and educational system (Brown, 2012). Emancipatory Communitarianism (Blustein,
2005) could be the new model for career development that would catalyst social
justice.
Lastly, the link between education and career is not made
salient enough to students. The
educational realm provides skills that are transferable to the world of work. Specifically, mathematics, language, and literacy
are at the forefront in every job (Brown, 2012). When students do not gain these skills and
leave the educational system their occupational struggle has become almost impossible
to achieve.
Brown, D. (2012). Career information, career counseling, and
career development (10th ed.). New
York: Pearson Education, Inc.
No comments:
Post a Comment