I thought our class
discussion on synchronicity was enlightening and further explored the
worldviews that others may have. I completely agree that in order to be an
effective counselor, worldviews need to be taken into consideration and that
the counselor should attempt to see the client’s situation through his/her
worldview. What happens when the client’s perceptions are different than the
dominant views? Do we as counselors try to educate the client or do we respect his/her
perceptions of the situation? For example, a female client is adamant that
women cannot work as a police officer because law enforcement is a male
dominated field. Despite her desire to work in law enforcement, she does not
pursue this career because of her belief dictated by religious values that
women should remain at home or in female dominated careers.
On a personal note, I
have a learning disability and I am aware that under the American Disabilities
Act (ADA) I have an equal opportunity for employment. I bring this up because I
recently received an email from learning services saying that companies in the
Lancaster area are looking for individuals who fall under ADA to increase the
company’s fulfillment of ADA requirements. I have mixed feelings about this
email and it reminds me of our discussion many weeks ago about the low rates of
employment of individuals with a disability (Brown, 2012). I am glad that
companies want to incorporate this population in their work force, however
motivation for this integration seems to be distorted. This raises the question
do these companies have the resources to fully assist in the development
(skills, self-growth, self-efficacy etc..) of these individuals and are these
companies purely hiring this population of workers to meet a quota.
Bloch (2005) discusses
Chaos theory and the nonlinear pathway that individuals can take in their
career development. I really liked the descriptions of attractors because it
labeled different career patterns that can occur for an individual. I thought
it was interesting that strange attractors can be viewed by some as a
synchronistic event or serendipity. I preferred this article’s description of synchronicity
because it was described as an observable phenomenon that can happen to all
individuals whereas in Guindon and Hanna’s (2002) article two out of the three
criteria for synchronicity included a vision or a dream. Even though I am not
spiritual, the spirituality component of Chaos theory gives an overall
connection to all life forces and I find that this notion of connection is appropriate
in the context of this theory. I also liked how “connectedness” or spirituality
can be achieved through connectors. The use of connectors can be applied to
individuals who are not spiritual since connectors are universal constructs.
Bloch, D. P. (2005). Complexity, Chaos, and Nonlinear Dynamics:
A New Perspective on Career Development Theory. The Career Development
Quarterly, 53, 194-207.
Brown, D. (2012). Introduction to the Global, Economy, and
Social Justice, and Career Development. In Career Information, Career
Counseling, and Career Development (10th ed., pp. 2-23). Chapel Hill, SC:
Pearson.
Guindon, M. H., & Hanna, F. J. (2002). Coincidence,
Happenstance, Serendipity, Fate or the Hand of God: Case Studies in
Synchronicity. The Career Development Quarterly, 50, 195-208.
No comments:
Post a Comment