I must say that I was rather disappointed in
Joan Blades’ presentation. I was under the assumption that she would share
information that was included in her books. I also thought that there would be
an enriching dialogue about current work trends, women’s rights in the
workplace, and information about increasing career satisfaction. Instead, Joan
focused on the premise of Living Room Conversations and what the structure of
this new project entailed. I was not
really sure the goal of Living Room Conversations. I can understand that open
conversation is needed about pressing topics but my questions remains how does
this open dialogue move towards action or political reforms. Mutual respect
between conflicting parties is a great start, however this is being done at a
community level and not a national level where the communication needs to be
occurring. I did like how Living Room Conversations have been used in the
mental health field between multiple agencies and the family of the identified
client. This reminds me of family based services or wrap around services for
children and adolescents.
In Guindon and Hanna’s (2002) article, the
definition of synchronicity and the use of synchronicity in counseling is
discussed. This concept of “meaningful coincidences” reminds me of Chaos theory
(Guidon & Hanna, 2002, p. 195). A central principle of Chaos theory is that
everything is connected and that individuals or careers form open systems and
are fractals of a larger system (Brown, 2012). When looking at Chaos theory,
synchronicity cannot then be considered coincidence but rather an effect of
interacting systems. This effect would be nonlinear and would interact
microscopically to form what we see.
I have a hard time accepting the three ways
synchronicity is shown. I especially do not like the emphasis on dreams or the
unconscious. I think I have a hard time placing an importance on dreams for
several reasons. First, connecting real life events to dreams reminds me of
soothsaying and superstition. I am not superstitious and I do not believe there
is a higher power so my cognitive bias automatically discredits this notion.
Second, I have not heard so far throughout my college career that dreams have
any relevance to real life happenings. I prefer scientific proof to collaborate
phenomena or theories.
Guidon and Hanna (2012) gave case studies that
illustrate synchronicity in a positive way that augments the current career
process. However, what if a synchronistic event is negative? For example, an
individual has a dream that symbolizes a catastrophe and a few days later
he/she is fired. The event is considered “meaningful” to the person because
he/she can no longer pay for necessities. I can see a client becoming stuck or
discouraged if they start thinking that they are powerless against outside
forces or chance events.
Brown, D. (2012). Learning Theory-Based, Postmodern, Socioeconomic, and Decision-Making Theories and Their Applications. In Career Information, Career Counseling, and Career Development (10th ed., pp. 59-79). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Guindon, M. H., & Hanna, F. J. (2002). Coincidence,
Happenstance, Serendipity, Fate or the Hand of God: Case Studies in
Synchronicity. The Career Development Quarterly, 50, 195-208.
No comments:
Post a Comment