As I read the text this week, I found
myself saying things like: “That makes sense” and “I wish I would have known
that sooner” quite frequently. To be
honest, I didn’t think I would enjoy reading this text very much based on my
assumptions of the content of career development. I have been pleasantly surprised and have
been fascinated with reading about the theories. I’ve already begun to try to apply some
things to my career choices and that of others around me.
So far, I like Holland’s theory
best. I like the idea of matching a
personality to a career through a code and somewhat magically following a road
map to find success and happiness. It
seems so logical and too simple, yet appealing at the same time. On page 34, Brown states that “the goal of
career exploration and counseling using Holland’s theory is to help client
groups identify occupations that include workers in them with the same
personality characteristics as their own (Brown, 2012).” I don’t think I’ve ever taken the time to
investigate career choices based on the co-workers that I likely will
encounter, but after looking back at the different positions I’ve held
throughout my career thus far, it is pretty easy for me to recognize that the
co-workers that challenged me most were those that had very different personalities
than my own. I see this in my classroom
all the time too. Students generally
like to work with people who are like them.
Those who like to explore, investigate, and experiment with the world
around them typically find less enjoyment with people who are off task (social)
or dominant and impulsive (enterprising) than with others like themselves
(Brown, 2012). Those who enjoy creating
things through music, art, and drama, often feel more free and understood with
like-minded people versus conventional, unoriginal peers (Brown, 2012).
Holland’s theory emphasizes
personality, which by his definition (1997) includes “inherited
characteristics, activities to which an individual is exposed, and the
interests that grow from those exposures (Brown, 2012, p. 30).” Though it is not always the case, many family
members within and between generations share similar personalities, exposures,
and interests. It makes sense then, that
the time shared engaging in common activities of interest would lead to
compatibility with similar careers.
Creating family trees and/or genograms while in school could be a
fascinating way to make connections among family members. I think students at any level would really
enjoy creating this type of project and it could shed light on areas of their
family or personalities that they never considered before seeing how the
careers connect within their family. I
think it is a great idea to link a family tree or genogram with history or
other subjects that could be linked to career development (Gibson, 2005). It could also align with multiple goals to
involve and communicate with parents and guardians by encouraging discussions
at home and providing opportunities to share what was learned through the project.
Brown, D. (2012).
Trait-and-Factor and Developmental Theories of Career Choice and Development
and their Applications. In Career Information, Career Counseling, and Career
Development (10th ed., pp. 2-23). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gibson, D. M. (2005).
The Use of Genograms in Career Counseling with Elementary, Middle, and High
School Students. The Career Development Quarterly, 53, 353-362.
I enjoyed reading your post :) I also thought I would not enjoy this text but have been finding it more interesting as we continue. Although I did not write about Holland's theory, I agree that much of it makes sense and could be beneficial for students (as well as adults).
ReplyDelete