Synchronicity is certainty an interesting concept and seems
somewhat mystical or magical. The article connected it mainly with religion and
spirituality (Guindon & Hanna, 2002).
I have to admit after reading the article I did not question the concept
and just accepted it as a part of life experiences. Although now, I have thought about it some
more and developed a more critical viewpoint.
I do agree with Jung, there are events that are
unpredictable and seemingly unrelated yet comprise of a meaningful coincidence
(Guindon & Hanna, 2002). However, does this concept have any permit in
career counseling? Career counseling can
aid an individual to be prepared and opportunistic of synchronicity. In this way the philosophical concept is
useful, but the theory seems hard to test and it is not falsifiable. In other words, if an individual had not gone
to career counseling the events prior and proceeding that are unrelated are
still happening, so will that individual still experience synchronicity even
though they had not gone to career counseling?
Will they still take the opportunity for career change? But researchers would never be able to
develop an experiment in this way.
We can experience synchronicity without knowing the
term. Furthermore, it is easier to look
back retrospectively and make connections between unrelated events and make
them relate. It is harder to know if one
event had not happened would there be a different outcome. Moreover, some clients may make connections
of unrelated events and make a coincidence that is unhelpful or in the wrong
direction. How would synchronicity work
with special populations or even with a client who overthinks and over analyzes?
I think that in my
undergraduate coursework we learned that psychology can be just as much of a science
as the “hard sciences”. The
philosophical underpinnings of synchronicity create an unappealing theory for
practitioners, thus it makes sense there is very little literature and research
on synchronicity.
However, the concept and recognition of synchronicity is
important to create a more holistic approach toward career counseling (Guindon
& Hanna, 2002). I thought that was a
good point made in the article because there does not need to be a dichotomy of
subjective and objective practices. As
future professionals going into fields with a variety of theories that are in
objection to each other it is essential for us to recognize their strengths,
weaknesses, and connections in order to best serve clients and the community.
In this case an individual who has indecision and is highly
religious or spiritual would benefit from a synchronicity viewpoint. For example, the counselor could use a
constructivist counseling theory and elicit a life theme which would include
some religious or spiritual aspects (since the person is highly spiritual and
religious) (Duffy, 2006; Savickas, 1995).
At the same time the counselor could make the client aware of
synchronicity. Hopefully this will help
the client with indecision and make him or her aware of “unpredictable
instances of meaning coincidence” (Guindon & Hanna, 2002, p. 195) in turn
leading to a career decision.
Duffy,
R. D. (2006). Spirituality, religion, and career development: Current status
and future directions. The Career
Development Quarterly, 55, 55-63.
Guindon,
M. H. & Hanna, F. J. (2002)
Coincidence, happenstance, serendipity, fate, or the hand of God: Case studies in synchronicity. The
Career Development Quarterly, 50,
195-208.
Savickas, M. L. (1995).
Constructivist counseling for career indecision. The Career
Development Quarterly, 43(4), 363-373.